Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Kan. 113 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably State v. Kemble (2010), State v. Gaither (2007)

27 state decisions

150200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Aikins · In re L.A. · In Re the Adoption of B.M.W. · State v. Gadelkarim · State v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'If a proper and reasonable construction will render the remark unobjectionable, the remark is not prejudicial.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “should exercise restraint over judicial conduct and utterances.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “limit[] comments and rulings to what is reasonably required for the orderly progress of the trial, and refrain[] from unnecessary disparagement of persons or issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.