Anderson v. Bruce’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Weaver v. Graham · Miller v. Florida · Gleason v. Samaritan Home & Church Mutual Insurance · United States v. Bailey · Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Inteipretation of a statute is a question of law over which an appellate court’s review is unlimited. [Citation omitted.] In construing statutes and determining legislative intent, several provisions of an act, in pari materia, must be construed together with a view of reconciling and bringing them into workable harmony, if possible. [Citation omitted.]” Anderson v. Bruce, 274 Kan. 37, 39 , 50 P.3d 1 (2002).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.