In Re Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2022
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman · Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreault · In Re Carson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““KRPC 8.5 states: ‘A lawyer admitted to practice in this jurisdiction is subject to the disciplinaiy authority of this jurisdiction although engaged in practice elsewhere.’ “There is no conflict between state and federal jurisdiction. Arnold’s actions were not proper in federal court just as they were not proper in state court. We retain the power to discipline attorneys for conduct committed outside of and beyond our Kansas courts.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Dennis“In this case, Arnold's behavior shows a complete lack of respect toward the judiciary. His style was sarcastic, insulting, and threatening and subjected him to the discipline that was entered. The remedy for a believed erroneous trial court ruling is appeal, not an intemperate writing faxed to the judge shortly after the ruling was made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Jordan“A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a 71 judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Jordan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.