In Re Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2010
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re Stump · Bar Ass'n v. Casey · In the Matter of Eldridge · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ward v. Harrington · In Re Sparks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is difficult to conceive of a more serious professional offense than the destruction of the verity of an examiner’s certificate to depositions. Unless the courts can rely on the accuracy of depositions, the administration of justice would be hopelessly bogged down.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Miniard“The relationship [attorney-client] is one of trust and confidence, and it is the duty of the courts to preserve it upon a high plane of moral responsibility for the protection of the public.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.