Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Minn. 273 - Halverson v. Rolvaag

Halverson v. Rolvaag’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 1989

16 state decisions

60196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lynch v. United States · Yaeger v. Delano Granite Works · Gibbs v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'n · Rookledge v. Garwood · Slezak v. Ousdigian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chapter 192, is amended by adding a new section to read: “[192.391] Any payments made to a member of the national guard, his dependent widow, minor children or parent under any law of the United States of America arising out of the injury or death for which a claim for compensation is made against the state of Minnesota under Minnesota Statutes 1961, Sections 192.38 or 192.39, except payments under the federal social security act or the federal government life insurance program for members of the armed forces, shall be deducted from any payments made pursuant to said sections 192.38 or 192.39. “Sec. 2. Section 1 applies to all claims past, present, and future arising under Minnesota Statutes 1961, Sections 192.38 or 192.39, except claims now pending before a court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.