State v. Gollehon’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably People v. Shreck (2001), United States v. Beasley (1996)
2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · 115 S. Ct. 89 - Green v. United States · State v. Moore · State v. Perry · State v. Gollehon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Following a verdict or finding of guilty, the court may grant the defendant a new trial if required in the interest of justice. A new trial may be ordered by the court without a motion or may be granted after motion and hearing. (2) The motion for a new trial must be in writing and must specify the grounds for a new trial. The motion must be filed by the defendant within 30 days following a verdict or finding of guilty and be served upon the prosecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McCarthy“judicially created exception[ ] to § 46-16-702, MCA, solely because [its] constitutional due process implications ... transcend the otherwise clear and unambiguous requirements of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hawkins v. Mahoney“it is a misapplication of our decision in [ Perry ] to argue that its analysis should be extended beyond other cases with like facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hawkins v. Mahoney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.