Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Mont. 264 - State v. Graves

State v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
9
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2016

16 state decisions

110199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Cassiere · United States v. Callahan · Melissa E. Debenedetto, a Minor by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Frances Debenedetto v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation, Deborah Samluk Drier v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation · United States v. Ajmal · United States v. Lewin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While we neither encourage nor discourage the practice of allowing jurors to question witnesses, we, nevertheless, caution trial courts which allow this practice to be ever mindful that the jury's fact-finding role is to be accomplished in a spirit of neutrality, fairness, and open-mindedness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We hold that allowing juror-inspired questions in a criminal case is not prejudicial per se, but is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. To minimize the risk of prejudice ... the practice must be carefully controlled by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.