Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 N.C. 536 - State v. Spence

State v. Spence’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1983 · most notably Parker v. North Carolina (1970), State v. Atkinson (1969)

54 state decisions

400196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993) · 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Malloy v. Hogan · Bumper v. North Carolina · United States v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . We simply cannot conclude, either on the basis of the record now before us or as a matter of judicial notice, that the exclusion of jurors opposed to capital punishment results in an unrepresentative jury on the issue of guilt or substantially increases the risk of conviction. In light of the presently available information, we are not prepared to announce a per se constitutional rule requiring the reversal of every conviction returned by a jury selected as this one was.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that a sentence of death cannot be carried out if the jury that imposed or recommended it was chosen by excluding veniremen for cause simply because they voiced general objections to the death penalty or expressed conscientious or religious scruples against its infliction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.