Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 N.W.2d 307 - State v. Wright

State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2003

12 state decisions

701979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · State v. Hall · State v. Jacoby · State v. Feddersen · State v. Jensen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before jury arguments, the court shall give to each counsel a copy of its instructions in their final form, noting this fact of record and granting reasonable time for counsel to make objections, which shall be made and ruled on before arguments to- the jury. Within such time, all objections to giving or failing to give any instruction must be made in writing or dictated into the record, out of the jury’s presence, specifying the matter objected to and on what grounds. No other grounds or objections shall be asserted thereafter, or considered on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “defendant advised the court what he wanted and why; the court ruled upon the matter before arguments to the jury; and it was all on the record. We conclude these instructions as to which the record was made were “final” instructions for purposes of determining sufficiency of defendant’s record on failure to give his requested instruction, and that the record so made was an “objection” sufficient to preserve the matter for appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he purpose of requiring compliance with rule 196 procedure is to “fully (alert) the trial court to the point of law and question of fact on which he relies in urging the requested instruction be given.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.