Warder & Lee Elevator, Inc. v. Britten’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
1 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2009
1 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell · 16 Ariz. App. 415 - Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc. · Grefe v. Ross · Farmland Service Coop, Inc. v. Klein · Miller v. Lawlor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The provisions of subsection 3 of section 622.32 do not apply where the purchase money, or any portion thereof, has been received by the vendor, or when the vendee, with the actual or implied consent of the vendor, has taken and held possession of the premises under and by virtue of the contract, or when there is any other circumstance which, by the law heretofore in force, would have taken the case out of the statute of frauds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peterson v. Petersen“unless displaced by the particular provision of this chapter”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“except as otherwise provided in this section”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.