Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 ORAPP 222 - Sullivan v. Popoff

Sullivan v. Popoff’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the post-conviction court failed to make findings of fact on all the issues-and there is evidence from which such facts could be decided more than one way-we will presume that the facts were decided consistently with the post-conviction court's conclusions of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “are bound by the post-conviction court's findings of historical fact if those findings are supported by the evidence in the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.