Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 So. 2d 256 - Nelson v. State

274 So. 2d 256 - Nelson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

307
cited by 307 later decisions
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 301 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 307 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Hardwick v. State (1988), 846 So. 2d 472 - Logan v. State (2003)

3 federal appellate · 301 state decisions

112019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Chalk v. Beto · 156 So. 2d 395 - Wilder v. State · Cappetta v. State · 270 So. 2d 408 - Love v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 307 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If incompetency of counsel is assigned by the defendant as the reason, or a reason, the trial judge should make a sufficient inquiry of the defendant and his appointed counsel to determine whether or not there is reasonable cause to believe that the court appointed counsel is not rendering effective assistance to the defendant. If reasonable cause for such belief appears, the court should make a finding to that effect on the record and appoint a substitute attorney who should be allowed adequate time to prepare the defense. If no reasonable basis appears for a finding of ineffective representation, the trial court should so state on the record and advise the defendant that if he discharges his original counsel the State may not thereafter be required to appoint a substitute.”
    45 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"This appeal raises what seems to be a recurring issue — [viz. what is] the procedure which the trial court should follow for the purpose of protecting an indigent's Sixth Amendment right to counsel in a criminal prosecution where before the commencement of the trial the Defendant moves to discharge appointed counsel."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.