Vance v. Vance’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1985
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 98 So. 2d 334 - Cortina v. Cortina · 132 So. 2d 456 - Scheer v. Scheer · Cortina v. Cortina · 118 So. 2d 106 - Hardy v. Hardy · 245 So. 2d 658 - Longo v. Longo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our opinion here is to be interpreted as being without prejudice to the rights of the parties to institute and maintain the usual contempt proceedings or to seek specific modification of the judgment as provided by Section 61.14, F.S. 1971, F.S.A. as they are advised. See Cortina v. Cortina, Fla.App. 1958, 108 So.2d 63 ; Annot. 85 A.L.R.2d 118 (1964).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.