Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 S.W.2d 385 - Ockerman v. Wise

Ockerman v. Wise’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2007

4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

30195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vassill's Adm'r v. Scarsella · Irwin v. Smith · Adcox v. Southern Ry. Co. · Fielder v. Hansbrough · Wooster v. Forty-Second Street & Grand Street Ferry Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) If an action is commenced in due time and in good faith in any court of this state and the defendants or any of them make defense, and it is adjudged that the court has no jurisdiction of the action, the plaintiff or his representative may, within ninety (90) days from the time of that judgment, commence a new action in the proper court. The time between the commencement of the first and last action shall not be counted in applying any statute of limitation. (2) As used in this section, “court” means all courts, commissions, and boards which are judicial or quasi-judicial tribunals authorized by the Constitution or statutes of the Commonwealth of Kentucky or of the United States of America. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This view is consistent with the prime purpose of the statute to afford a full opportunity for a hearing on the merits * * * In his quest for the proper forum a plaintiff may irritate a defendant with a prolixity of litigation, but this is not proscribed by the statute unless it is done in bad faith. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.