Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 SW2D 48 - Bartley v. Bartley

Bartley v. Bartley’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2015

8 state decisions

301954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bates & Rogers Construction Co. v. Allen · Turner, Day & Woolworth Handle Co. v. Morris · Columbus Mining Co. v. Childers · Totz Coal Co. v. Creech · Humble v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In view of the nature of the alleged injury suffered by the appellant and the known fact that herniated discs often appear gradually and are disabling in proportion to the degree of progress of the herniation, we conclude as a matter of law the notice was adequate and was given as soon as practicable.” (Emphasis ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.