Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 U.S. 215 - Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. United States

Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

274 U.S. 215 · 1927

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
29
cited 29 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions (29 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2002 · most notably Boston Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States (1928), Jacobs v. United States (1933)

7 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

190192719301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States · Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United States · Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. United States · Plymouth Coal Company v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania T · United States v. Rogers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the full and perfect equivalent of the property taken . . . the owner shall be put in as good position pecuniarily as he would have been if his property had not been taken . . . the owner is not limited to the value of the property at the time of the taking; he is entitled to such addition as will produce the full equivalent of that- value paid contemporaneously with the taking. Interest at a proper rate is a good measure by which to ascertain the amount so to be added.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.