Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 U.S. 657 - Weedin v. Bow

Weedin v. Bow’s Empirical Analysis

274 U.S. 657 · 1927

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 12 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably Morrison v. People of State of California (1934), Miller v. Albright (1998)

37 federal appellate · 12 district · 2 state decisions

1701927193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedWeedin v. Chin Bow (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wong Kim Ark · United States v. Freeman · Cope v. Cope · State v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All children heretofore born or hereafter bom out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, whose fathers were or may be at the time of their birth citizens thereof, are declared to be citizens of the United States; but the rights of citizenship shall not descend to children whose fathers never resided in the United States.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “attached more importance to actual residence in the United States as indicating a basis for citizenship than it did to descent.... [T]he heritable blood of citizenship was thus associated unmistakeably with residence within the country which was thus recognized as essential to full citizenship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “citizenship to a generation whose birth, minority and majority, whose education, and whose family life, have all been out of the United States and naturally within the ... environment of an alien country”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.