OpenJurist › Volume 274 › U.S. › Page 718 274 U.S. 718
Pierce v. Barker Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1927-05-02
2 counsel of record
Relies on Booth Fisheries Co. v. Industrial Commission
Good law ✅ — No negative treatment on record how we know
Decided 1927-05-02
How this case has been cited Cited by 28 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2005 · most notably John King Mfg Co v. City Council of August (1928), Magruder v. Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Realty Corp. (1942)
8 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
11 0 1927 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 decided Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Error to the Supreme . Court of the State of Wisconsin.
¶2 (Messrs. Clarence J. Hartley and J. A. Fowler for plaintiff in error, submitted.
¶3 Mr. T. L. McIntosh, with, whom Mr. Herman L. Ekem was on the brief, for defendants in error.
¶4 Per Curiam.
¶5 Affirmed on the authority of Booth Fisheries Co. v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin, 271 U. S. 208 .
Download
Copy
Embed on your site
iframe Markdown Preview card Button Hover to preview · click to copy the code
Counsel (Messrs. Clarence J. Hartley and J. A. Fowler for plaintiff in error, submitted. Mr. T. L. McIntosh, with, whom Mr. Herman L. Ekem was on the brief, for defendants in error. /274/us/718 · .json · Public domain