Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Va. 374 - King v. Cooley

King v. Cooley’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Clagett v. Commonwealth · Whittaker v. Commonwealth · Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson · Combs v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. · Bryan v. Burt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the physical or mental condition of the patient is at issue in a civil action, the diagnoses, signs and symptoms, observations, evaluations, histories, or treatment plan of the practitioner, obtained or formulated as contemporaneously documented during the course of the practitioner's treatment, together with the facts communicated to, or otherwise learned by, such practitioner in connection with such attendance, examination or treatment shall be disclosed but only in discovery pursuant to the Rules of Court or through testimony at the trial of the action.... Only diagnosis offered to a reasonable degree of medical probability shall be admissible at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “did not think that an occasional red blood cell would qualify for microscopic hematuria.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “I felt she was suffering from aspiration pneumonia.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.