¶1Defendants Fiersón and Rosenthal, in withdrawing their motion to dismiss the complaint, conceded sufficiency of plaintiffs’ proof, and the verdict, in turn, imported that those defendants were the primary wrongdoers. (Seeman v. Levine, 205 N. Y. 514, 517; Stevens v. South Bay Cons. Water Co., 228 App. Div. 851; Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Constr. Corp., 290 N. Y. 145, 155; Phoenix Bridge Co. v. Creem, 102 App. Div. 354, affd. 185 N. Y. 580; Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, 273 App. Div. 414, affd. 298 N. Y. 686; Dolnick v. Donner Lumber Corp., 275 App. Div. 954.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
275 A.D.2d 1044
Sorrin v. Fierson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 3, 1949
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1949-10-03
Relies on Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp. · Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc. · Groarke v. . Laemmle
Decided 1949-10-03