Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 275 F.2d 310 - Baty v. United States

Baty v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

275 F.2d 310 · 1960

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
July 2004
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2004

19 federal appellate ·

11019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314

Relies on Pereira v. United States · United States v. Paglia · United States v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Prior to 1948, the words, ‘or causes to bo transported,’ appeared in the section immediately after the word ‘transports.’ The reviser’s note explains that tlie deletion was made possible by a change in the definition of a principal, which as amended now reads: ‘Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would bo an offense against the United States is punishable as a principal.’ 18 U.S.C. § 2 (b).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Whoever, with unlawful or fraudulent intent, transports in interstate or foreign commerce any falsely made, forged, altered, or counterfeited securities or tax stamps, knowing the same to have been falsely made, forged, altered, or counterfeited; or * * *. “Shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.