Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 275 F.2d 646 - Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

275 F.2d 646 · 1960

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
December 1963
most recently cited

46 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Oliver · Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Board of Education of Jefferson County Alabama · Civil Aeronautics Board v. Summerfield · 162 F. Supp. 372 - Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we have not found a provision that personnel be secured through the offices of a union violative of the Act absent evidence that the union unlawfully discriminated in supplying the Company with personnel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.