Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 275 F.3d 478 - Fields v. Bagley

Fields v. Bagley’s Empirical Analysis

275 F.3d 478 · 2001

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2024

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

120200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · United States v. Cronic · Picard v. Connor · Evitts v. Lucey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a petitioner invites an error in the trial court, he is precluded from seeking habeas corpus relief for that error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.