Herrada v. City of Detroit’s Empirical Analysis
275 F.3d 553 · 2001
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Rector v. City and County of Denver (2003), Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n (2006)
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Boykin v. Alabama · Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft · United States v. Layne · Jackson v. City of Columbus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly state[d] that a hearing is available to contest the City's allegation that”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Herrada contends that the City interfered with her property interest by making false and misleading statements in the citation and overdue notice she received. If these notices failed to comport with the requirements of procedural due process, the City arguably violated Herrada’s rights, because she paid her fines only after receiving the no tices. We must therefore determine whether the notices that she received were constitutionally sufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he City's notices were ... reasonably calculated to inform vehicle owners of the allegations against them and the procedures available to obtain a hearing to contest the allegations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.