Bishop Processing Company v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
July 1968
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 42 U.S.C. § 1857 · 42 U.S.C. § 1857D · 5 U.S.C. § 703 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE WASHINGTON In the Matter of INTERSTATE AIR POLLUTION IN SELBYVILLE, DELAWARE-BISHOP, MARYLAND, AREA NOTICE “There are attached hereto, and made a part hereof, the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations, dated May 19, 1967, of the Hearing Board convened pursuant to the pro visions of section 105(e) (1) of the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 1857d(e) (1)] which held a public hearing in the matter of the interstate air pollution in the Selbyville, Delaware-Bishop, Maryland area. “In accordance with section 105(e) (3) of the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 1857d(e) (3)] the Bishop Processing Company, Bishop, Maryland is hereby notified and directed to cease and desist from discharging malodorous air pollutants and to abate such air pollution not later than December 1, 1967, by the installation, completion and placing into operation adequate and effective control systems and devices, as recommended by the Hearing Board. “Dated: May 25, 1967. (S) John W. Gardner Secretary””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.