James v. James’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Green v. Green · Lucas v. Lucas · Crenshaw v. Crenshaw · Hardwick v. Hardwick · Wright v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his case is not like Green[, supra], or Crenshaw v. Crenshaw, 267 Ga. 20 ( 471 SE2d 845 ) (1996). In those cases, we held that the plaintiff who brought suit, and was not represented by counsel at the time of the hearing, was entitled to be given notice of the hearing by opposing counsel. Unlike a defendant who does not file a responsive pleading, a plaintiff does not waive all notices. Cf. OCGA § 9-11-5 (d). Thus, unlike [Wife] in this case, the plaintiffs in Green and Cren-shaw did not waive their right to be notified of the time of trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. Ellis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.