Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 275 Ga. 261 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · In re Draffin · Nelloms v. State · Jackson v. State · Perry v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “merely because counsel is not diligent in protecting the right to a speedy trial is no excuse for the failure of the State to intervene and prevent an egregiously long period of pretrial detention. However, we must acknowledge that delay often does work to the advantage of an accused, and thus can be the result of a tactical decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no evidence that appellant's pre-trial incarceration was oppressive to a degree beyond that which necessarily attends imprisonment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “at the time of arrest or when formal charges are brought, whichever is earlier.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.