Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · In re Draffin · Nelloms v. State · Jackson v. State · Perry v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“merely because counsel is not diligent in protecting the right to a speedy trial is no excuse for the failure of the State to intervene and prevent an egregiously long period of pretrial detention. However, we must acknowledge that delay often does work to the advantage of an accused, and thus can be the result of a tactical decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no evidence that appellant's pre-trial incarceration was oppressive to a degree beyond that which necessarily attends imprisonment”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ollivier“at the time of arrest or when formal charges are brought, whichever is earlier.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.