Taylor v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2012
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 119 Ill. 2d 316 - In Re Marriage of Eckert · 7 Ill. 2d 545 - In Re Estate of Leichtenberg · 215 Ill. App. 3d 459 - In Re Marriage of Berk · 237 Ill. App. 3d 510 - In Re Marriage of Pfeiffer · 244 Ill. App. 3d 1023 - S.B. Lexington, Inc. v. Near North Insurance Agency, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may contain provisions concerning the custody and guardianship of the child, [and] visitation privileges with the child, * * * which the court shall determine in accordance with the relevant factors set forth in the [Marriage Act] * * * and any other applicable law of Illinois, to guide the court in a finding in the best interests of the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the Parentage Act contains no provisions requiring that actions for removal be resolved pursuant to section 609 of the Marriage Act, we find that section 609 of the Marriage Act is not implicitly incorporated into the Parentage Act”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he presumption in favor of the trial court's decision is compelling in such cases and should not be disturbed merely because we might arrive at a different conclusion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.