Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

275 S.C. 444

272 S.E.2d 439

State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 20, 1980

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1980-11-20

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2008

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Littlejohn, Justice

¶1(dissenting) :

¶2I respectfully dissent and would simply hold that assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature is not a crime of moral turpitude. I do so, well appreciating the fact that occasionally this offense may involve matters of moral tur*447pitude, but I would not impose upon the trial judge the burden of determining which offenses (of which a witness or defendant has been convicted) meet the requirement. In my view, the rule set forth in the majority opinion would create more problems than it solved.

/275/sc/444 · .json · Public domain