Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 275 SE2D 842 - State v. Duvall

State v. Duvall’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2018

24 state decisions

1201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brewer v. United States · Roberts v. Florida · Pope v. Nebraska · Rust v. Johnson · Beal v. Franklin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is true that one superior court judge ordinarily may not overrule a prior judgment of another superior court judge in the same case on the same issue. Calloway v. Motor Co., 281 N.C. 496 , 189 S.E.2d 484 (1972); State v. McClure, 280 N.C. 288 , 185 S.E.2d 693 (1972) .... However, this rule is inapplicable to interlocutory orders, which do not determine the issue, but rather direct some proceeding preliminary to a final decree.... A motion for a special venire is a pretrial order, the granting or denial of which is within the trial court's sound discretion. N.C.Gen.Stat. 15A-958. See also State v. Yoes and Hale v. State, 271 N.C. 616 , 157 S.E.2d 386 (1967). "Interlocutory orders are subject to change `at any time to meet justice and equity of the case upon sufficient grounds shown for the same.'" Calloway, supra, 281 N.C. at 502 , 189 S.E.2d at 488 . Therefore, when the circumstances have changed during the time between the original denied motion and the subsequent renewed motion, a trial judge may, in his discretion, grant the renewed motion in the interest of justice. More than five months elapsed between the two motions for a special venire. The state presented additional and current evidence that defendant would not be able to receive a fair and impartial trial before a jury comprised of residents of Dare County, where he was a prominent citizen and where considerable publicity had occurred. We hold that Judge Brown did not abuse his discretion by hearing and granting ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(b) A judge, on motion of the State or the defendant, must disqualify himself from presiding over a criminal trial or other criminal proceeding if he is: (1) Prejudiced against the moving party or in favor of the adverse party; or (4) For any other reason unable to perform the duties required of him in an impartial manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “one superior court judge ordinarily may not overrule a prior judgment of another superior court judge in the same case on the same issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.