Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 275 SW2D 164 - State v. Lemaster

State v. Lemaster’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1967
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although paragraph (e) [Art. 667-6 Penal Code] provides for an appeal to the District Court by the applicant [for beer license] in event his application is denied, we find no provision in the Article giving a contestant the right to appeal from the order of the County Judge granting a permit. “It is our opinion, therefore, that the District Court was not in error in sustaining the plea in abatement to the attempted appeal of the State from the order of the County Judge granting ap-pellee a permit to sell beer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.