Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 275 SW2D 356 - State v. Hampton

State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
July 1980
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 1980 · most notably State v. Cuckovich (1972), State v. Biddle (1980)

31 state decisions

1301955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Murphy · State v. Richetti · State v. Hinojosa · State v. Carenza · State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our view, while the fact that a five-dollar roll of dimes, wrapped in the same colored paper as the missing roll, was the same day found in the possession of defendant was a circumstance admissible in evidence; nevertheless, inasmuch as there was no evidence sufficiently identifying the roll of dimes defendant had as that taken from the tavern, this circumstance was not substantial evidence inconsistent with a reasonable hypothesis of defendant’s innocence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.