Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 275 SW3D 22 - Webb v. State

Webb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 81st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Johnson v. State · Cain v. State · Watson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To obtain a conviction for the manufacture of a controlled substance, the State must link the defendant either to an interest in the place where the manufacturing was taking place or to the actual act of manufacturing.” Webb v. State, 275 S.W.3d 22, 27 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2008, no pet.).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.