Adams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 81st Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Brady v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante · Boykin v. State · Marin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We conclude that the Texas Constitution precludes the deliberation of more than twelve jurors. TEX. CONST. art. V, § 13. If the alternate is not considered a juror, then the participation of the alternate in deliberations violates article 36.22's prohibition against outside influence. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 36.22 (Vernon 2006).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trinidad v. State“No person shall be permitted to be with a jury while it is deliberating.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trinidad v. State“the remainder of the jury shall have the power to render the verdict[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trinidad v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.