Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 275 U.S. 142 - Blodgett v. Holden

Blodgett v. Holden’s Empirical Analysis

275 U.S. 142 · 1927

Citation profile

875
cited by 875 later decisions
142
cited 142 times by the Supreme Court
26
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

282 federal appellate · 87 district · 116 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 875 later decisions (142 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2024 · most notably Furman v. Georgia (1972), Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority (1936)

282 federal appellate · 87 district · 116 state decisions — followed in 26 states

174019271930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Panama Co v. Johnson · Nichols v. Coolidge · United States ex rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co. · Hill v. Wallace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 875 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is the gravest and most delicate duty that this Court is called on to perform.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in entire good faith and without the slightest premonition of such consequence”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““ * * * And, further, that so far as applicable to bona fide gifts not made in anticipation of death and fully consummated prior to June 2, 1924, those provisions are arbitrary and invalid under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.