People v. Zer’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
April 2012
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court was not acting in a coercive manner when it reminded defendant of the scope of sentencing available in the event of a conviction after trial.”). 6 . For instance, it is permissible for a criminal defendant, by entering into a guilty plea, to waive”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McMahon v. Hodges
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.