Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

276 Conn. 906

State v. Edman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 6, 2005

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2005-10-06

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2013

16 state decisions

Relies on 90 Conn. App. 820 - State v. Edman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 820 (AC 25033), is granted, limited to the following issues:

¶2“1. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the issuing judge was not a ‘neutral and detached magistrate’ under the fourth amendment to the United States constitution when he issued a search warrant for the defendant’s home?

¶3“2. Did the Appellate Court properly remand this case to the trial court with direction to grant the motion to suppress without first holding a factual hearing?”

*907The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17516.Decided October 6, 2005Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.HughF. Keefe and Nancy Fitzpatrick Myers, in opposition.

¶4NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

/276/conn/906 · .json · Public domain