Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 F.1d 840 - Curley v. Tait

Curley v. Tait’s Empirical Analysis

276 F. 840 · 1921

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 1935
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Knowlton v. Moore · Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Laramie Stock Yards Company · United States v. Field · Mrs Camille Cahen v. John Brewster · Wright v. Blakeslee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If all beneficial ownership and’ possession irrevocably passes from the transferror at the time of the transfer, it would seem' to be immaterial whether it goes to one person or to several, and, if to several, whether their enjoyment is to be simultaneous or successive, and, if the latter, at what time or upon the happening of what event the rights of one give place to those of another.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.