Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 F.2d 433 - Grove Press, Inc., and Readers' Subscription, Inc. v. Robert K. Christenberry, Individually and as Postmaster of the City of New York

Grove Press, Inc., and Readers' Subscription, Inc. v. Robert K. Christenberry, Individually and as Postmaster of the City of New York’s Empirical Analysis

276 F.2d 433 · 1960

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2010 · most notably Ginzburg v. United States (1966), Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day (1962)

12 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

270196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roth v. United States · Smith v. People of the State of California · Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson · Niemotko v. State of Maryland Kelley · Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Regents of the University

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In short, all these passages to which the [United States Attorney] takes exception — in bulk only a portion of the book — are subordinate, but highly useful, elements to the development of the author’s central purpose. And that is not prurient.” id. at 439 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.