Naomi E. Jackson v. Franklin B. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Whitney-Forbes Inc Coar (1985), Howard Pattiz and Sidney Kleg v. Julia Schwartz and Julius Schwartz (1968)
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Klapprott v. United States · Sweet v. United States · United States Trust Co. v. Zelle · Central Railroad v. Director, Division of Tax Appeals of the Department of the Treasury · Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line R.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“errors therein (in judgments) arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time”), with Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the contemporaneous intent of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.