Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 F.2d 689 - Bertha Blum v. George A. Cottrell

Bertha Blum v. George A. Cottrell’s Empirical Analysis

276 F.2d 689 · 1960

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
December 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2011

9 federal appellate ·

30196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania Railroad v. Rychlik · Steele v. Crocker · Bantel v. Brownell · Yellow Cab Co. v. Eden · Wright v. Osborne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he question was one for the jury and not for the judge ... [but] the ruling was not so prejudicial to the plaintiff as to require a reversal of the judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.