Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 F.2d 705 - McCray v. United States

McCray v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

276 F.2d 705 · 1960

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on 133 Cal. App. 2d 25 - People v. Von Hecht

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When, as here, the offenses charged are substantive offenses and the defendants admit that they committed them, there is no room or place for purging guilt by abandonment of the criminal act and renunciation of the criminal intent. There is only place and time for a full confession of guilt and a plea for mitigation and mercy, based upon a sincere repentance and the promise of fruits worthy of such repentance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.