Johnson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
276 F.2d 84 · 1960
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2002
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 26 U.S.C. § 5008
Relies on Heflin v. United States · Prince v. United States · Albrecht v. United States · Ex Parte De Bara · Neely v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is clearly established that the illegal removal and illegal concealment of distilled spirits are distinct offenses under the statutes and are separately punishable even when both actions are proved by the same testimony. Widener v. Harris, 4 Cir., 60 F.2d 956 ; Rosser v. United States, 4 Cir., 75 F.2d 498 , certiorari denied 294 U.S. 730 , 55 S.Ct. 638 , 79 L.Ed. 1259 ; Tiller v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 131 F.2d 188 . * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.