Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

276 F.2d 919

Docket No. 18148.

Lambert v. James

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-04-22

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1960

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Anderson · Moran v. Prather · Edward E. Morgan Co. v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1960-04-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Leon A. Picou, Jr., John R. Rarick, St. Francisville, La., George R. Blue, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Landman Teller, of Teller, Biedenharn & Rogers, Vicksburg, Miss., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal from the judgment of the Trial Court presents only questions of fact and one claim of erroneous admission of testimony by a hand-writing expert. The legal ruling on the admissibility of the testimony was clearly without error. The fact issues were all resolved by detailed findings of fact by the Trial Court. The judgment is affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Trial Court.

¶2

The subsidiary motions are denied.

/276/f2d/919 · .json · Public domain