Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 276 F.3d 326 - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Chicago Hospitals

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Chicago Hospitals’s Empirical Analysis

276 F.3d 326 · 2002

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Herrnreiter v. Chicago Housing Authority (2002), Shepherd v. Hunterdon Developmental Center (2002)

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

360200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Cruz LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.B. THOMAS, INC., Defendant-Appellee · Lisa L. Fitzgerald v. William Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service · Berg v. County of Allegheny

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the handwriting [was] on the wall' and the axe was about to fall,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hen an employer acts in a manner so as to have communicated to a reasonable employee that she will be terminated, and the plaintiff employee resigns, the employer's conduct may amount to a constructive discharge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] person who is told repeatedly that [s]he is not wanted [and] has no future ... would not be acting unreasonably if he decided that to remain with this employer would necessarily be inconsistent with even a minimal sense of self-respect, and therefore intolerable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.