Railing v. United Mine Workers’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 29 U.S.C. § 187 (§ 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Van Dusen v. Barrack · National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council · Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the case of successive damages suffered day by day * * * the statute begins to run on each day’s damage as it occurs. When suit is brought, the plaintiff may recover only for damages inflicted during the period of limitations immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘The statute began to run when the cause of action arose, and the cause of action arose when the damage occurred. Then action might have been brought.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.