276 Ga. App. 210 - Solomon v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Eiberger v. West · Tinsley v. Rice · Hughes v. Cobb · State v. Tye · Tune v. Beeland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the record here is replete with disputed facts concerning the dealings between Barnett, his corporations, and Solomon, there was no error in the trial court’s conclusion that Solomon had failed to come forward, in response to Barnett’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of corporate reinstatement, with sufficient evidence to show equitable estoppel as a defense to corporate reinstatement as a matter of law. See Eiberger v. West, 247 Ga. 767, 769 (1) ( 281 SE2d 148 ) (1981); Smith v. Direct Media Corp., 247 Ga. App. 771, 773 (1) ( 544 SE2d 762 ) (2001).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Solomon v. Barnett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.