276 Ga. App. 527 - Velasquez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
November 2015
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dixon v. State · 224 Ga. App. 645 - Lawson v. State · Coffee v. State · 195 Ga. App. 99 - Dyous v. State · 94 Ga. App. 437 - Goldstein v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . when with the intent to defraud he knowingly makes, alters, or possesses any writing in a fictitious name or in such manner that the writing as made or altered purports to have been made by another person, at another time, with different provisions, or by authority of one who did not give such authority.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When stopped by the police, Velasquez did not present the North Carolina identification card; it was only found in a search of his person after his arrest. The State did not show that Velasquez had ever presented the identification card to anyone at any time; all that was shown was mere possession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vasquez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.