276 Ga. App. 755 - Tolliver v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 141 Ga. App. 527 - Hallman v. State · 167 Ga. App. 77 - FARMERS &C. BANK OF TRENTON v. State · In re R.L.L. & J.M.L. · Amwest Surety Insurance v. Interstate Construction Co. · In Re Rll & Jml
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under OCGA § 16-13-49 [(e) (1)], a property interest shall not be subject to forfeiture if the interest holder establishes that he: (A) Is not legally accountable for the conduct giving rise to its forfeiture, did not consent to it, and did not know and could not reasonably have known of the conduct or that it was likely to occur; (B) Had not acquired and did not stand to acquire substantial proceeds from the conduct giving rise to its forfeiture . . . ; (C) With respect to conveyances for transportation only, did not hold the property jointly, in common, or in community with a person whose conduct gave rise to its forfeiture; (D) Does not hold the property for the benefit of or as nominee for any person whose conduct gave rise to its forfeiture . . . ; and (E) Acquired the interest. . . (b)efore the completion of the conduct giving rise to its forfeiture. . . , 3”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.