People v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 2009 · most notably 89 Ill. 2d 322 - People v. Whitlow (1982), 12 Ill. 2d 334 - The People v. Dukes (1957)
4 federal appellate · 55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Jennings · Carlton v. People · Farris v. People · Sanitary District v. Cullerton · Addison v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This is but the reiteration of a still more general rule that in all cases, civil or criminal, the evidence must be confined to the point in issue.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.